-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Le Wednesday 12 November 2008 00:14:40, vous avez écrit : >>> There are some very interesting propositions (with patches!) to >>> optimize >>> Python int and long types (especially the long integers). >> >> Just trying to clarify the focus: would you like to see any of these >> applied to 2.6? > > All optimisations patches are long and may introduce new > regressions. It's > better to wait for 2.7/3.1. > > But it would be nice to get numbits() method (or property?) in > Python 3.0(.1) > and/or Python 2.6.1. Anyone remember the bool debacle? - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSRodJHEjvBPtnXfVAQK0VwP/f2vyfahYxhRh/ug+ekMp63rhVvy2iMTn VXndnaKqJtJovjuM3YAGQk9/8l6tD4w0DklAi4e175aBvwzRkWb4RwMHGMO2/jn1 mNjloHqku6qIg6+p7jS5ytwsH6sGndgAjARY7jFE8OgYoYPrxtTabgXpr9HM631K a2j8FUmCVQ8= =yirj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4