-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > You need not feel that way. It's not you---the flexibility of dVCS > means that until the Powers That Be promulgate a Workflow, this will > be ambiguous. You're absolutely right. Adopting a dvcs opens up a much larger world of possible workflows and best practices, both for an individual and for a project. It's a case of too much choice, so I feel strongly that Python should adopt and explain exactly one preferred workflow that will work for most people and use cases. People can still experiment and find alternatives if they want. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSRMRb3EjvBPtnXfVAQJU0AQAugEbLciCd2EIzqPrPOmWykoK7+u1fCAh yLnc3aFeserk50WwYkfovZDZESNs8F8ADZ2CIVGK+5AWW+MC17YAx2P4M0gUEeLY ulTQmrpLuRZHVpD6vqoM9hnI/vvsLwTqcYgqB1lfSLdSZ8RnJTnUPQ7UY7Eq7kfS gmxDhUqYKVg= =T9CJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4