A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083408.html below:

[Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library?

[Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library? [Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library?Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Nov 4 22:36:58 CET 2008
Stefan Behnel wrote:

> I think the main advantage for stdlib modules is actually the maintenance
> cost. Having a single, easy-to-read code base for extension modules that
> compiles without modification in Py2.6/7 and Py3.0/3.1 (and 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5),
> makes life a lot easier for both maintainers and backporters.

Do you have any plans to support/use 3.0 type annotations so that one 
could develop function-oriented code in 3.0 and then compile efficient C 
(for whatever CPython version) without adding Python-incompatible cdefs?

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4