-> >> but obviously any choice would have to be a good one. -> >> [...] So, the question I see isn't if Cython should be -> >> allowed for standard library modules, but if the landscape of such -> >> solutions is at a point that any of them is ready to be committed to. -> -> Well, we had reports that existing, non-trivial C modules could be rewritten -> in Cython within a few days. But even if you are only talking about new -> modules that get added to the stdlib, all you really need to become -> independent of a specific Cython version is a good test suite for your code to -> make sure it keeps working as expected when you update your compiler. Hey, wait, isn't that also a requirement for Py3k? :) --titus -- C. Titus Brown, ctb at msu.edu
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4