A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083373.html below:

[Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library?

[Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library? [Python-Dev] Using Cython for standard library?Brendan O'Connor brenocon at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 10:52:53 CET 2008
>>> Is using Cython for anything in Modules/ really an option? In my limited
>>> experiments with it, I did like it.
>>>
>>> But using it for Python standard library stuff doesn't look quite right to
>>> me:
>>>
>>> - Option 1: distribute Cython with Python and integrate into build process
>>> -- Ouch!
>>
>> Can you be a bit more descriptive?
>
> Cython is still being worked on (intensively, it seems). Bundling it
> with Python means deciding on a particular version probably for
> an entire major release lifecycle (use Cython x.y.{newest} for
> Python 2.7, for example).

If we're talking about Cython for core libraries...

For the subset of python that also works in Cython, I've seen a 10-30%
performance speedups on (admittedly trivial) test code.  Conceivably,
*everything* could be Cython-compiled if you cared about performance
more than transparency.

Brendan
anyall.org
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4