> Since I have never seen that come up during Python's development I am > going to leave it out. But I do see the benefit and how it might help > with future work. Of course, that's entirely up to you. But it strikes me as an odd approach to the selection of scenarios for a tool whose intention is precisely to support new usage scenarios. > As I mentioned in the doc, the first example allows for whatever the > DVCS does for diffs, whether that is a full-on branch or not. Are you looking for new scenarios or for the validation of your document? :-) I'm talking about history-carrying diffs which can be attached and sent via mail, not about viewing plain diffs, which every VCS tool in the world can do since version 0.0. Anyway, I guess you already have what you want. Good luck picking the right choice! -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4