On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 08:46 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > I have started the DVCS PEP which can be seen at > > http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg7fctr4_40dvjkdg64 . Not much is there > > beyond the rationale, usage scenarios I plan to use, and what other > > sections I plan to write. > > > > I think you really should not exclude any dvcs based on it's > implementation language. > I.e. requiring it being written in python for the sake of "eating your > own dogfood" is just a very weak argument. > git is certainly missing from your list. It does certainly miss from the list, but the argument might be more "favor your users"; call it nepotism if you like. If I understand it clearly, it is not a requirement, but more a good point. If it does "taste like dog food" in places, then it might be easier to: - make informed statements about what might be the reason (on an implementation standpoint - regarding features, that's an other story) - have the cook more receptive to comments L. > Regards, > - Ralf > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/lgautier%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4