Jesse Noller schrieb: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Farshid Lashkari <flashk at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I would like to renew the discussion now that "there is a PEP" to see >>> if there are any outstanding things people would like to get resolved. >>> I chose to continue to push it for 2.6 / 3.0 inclusion due to feedback >>> both here and elsewhere that people would rather see this in sooner in >>> some form, rather than later (i.e.: 2.7/3.1). >> >> I'm not sure if this is a big issue, but I just tested the module with >> an application that embeds Python and it doesn't work properly. >> Instead of spawning worker threads using python.exe, it attempts to >> use the application. Does the processing module allow specifying the >> exe to use for spawning worker threads? I would definitely like to see >> this included in the next release, and having support for embedded >> Python interpreters would be a big plus. >> >> -Farshid >> > > Let's take this off-list Farshid - but I would like to know more about > your application (I'm not up to speed with embedding python in other > applications) so I can either add it to the PEP or discuss how best to > address this within the module itself. This may be an issue for py2exe users as well. Please keep me informed (or is there a pyprocessing mailing list where this is discussed?). Thanks, Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4