Greg Ewing schrieb: > Bill Janssen wrote: > >> Look, even if there were *no* additional methods, it's worth adding >> the base class, just to differentiate the class from the Sequence, as >> a marker, so that those of us who want to ask "isinstance(o, String)" >> can do so. > > Doesn't isinstance(x, basestring) already cover that? That doesn't cover UserString, for example. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4