Georg Brandl <g.brandl <at> gmx.net> writes: > > It does, but I don't see how it contradicts my proposition. find() takes a > substring as well. Well, I'm not sure what your proposal was :-) Did you mean to keep split() out of the String interface, or to provide a default implementation of it based on find() and slicing?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4