A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079722.html below:

[Python-Dev] Slice as a copy... by design?

[Python-Dev] Slice as a copy... by design? [Python-Dev] Slice as a copy... by design?Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 23 00:35:19 CEST 2008
Facundo Batista wrote:

> A thread in PyAr raised the question that, considering that strings
> are immutable, why a slice of a string is a copy and not a reference
> to a part of that string.

Because it would make it too easy to accidentally keep
a large string alive via a reference to a small part
of it.

Some way of explicitly requesting a view into another
string might be desirable, but it shouldn't be the
default behaviour for string slicing.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4