Facundo Batista wrote: > Hi! > > A thread in PyAr raised the question that, considering that strings > are immutable, why a slice of a string is a copy and not a reference > to a part of that string. > > I couldn't answer why, so I'm asking here...Is it because the > reference counting will be complicated? Is it because it'd be > inefficient in other way? It's something else? Or is something that > could be done... but is not done yet? > > Thank you very much! > > In fact, a slice is *not* always a copy! In at least some (simple) cases, a slice references the original string: >>> s = 'abc' >>> t = s[:] >>> s is t True >>> id(s) 3081872000L >>> id(t) 3081872000L Gary Herron
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4