>> Writing portable ctypes modules is really hard - significantly harder >> than writing portable C code (although writing non-portable ctypes >> code is apparently easier than writing non-portable C code). > > I would say that writing portable C code is hard as well, aren't there > just more tools that help? The C compiler in particular. It already gets symbolic constants and struct layouts right, something that ctypes can't do (because it doesn't use header files). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4