RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 22 01:08:48 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079681.html

Alex Martelli wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
>> Putting this functionality in 2.6/3.0 would provide a really
>> nice incentive to update from Py2.5.  It would be a sad
>> lost opportunity if this module had to wait another couple years.
> 
> I feel essentially the same way: it WOULD be sad to waste this
> excellent opportunity, so I second the suggestion to put pyprocessing
> in the library right now.

Thirded (I think I'm contradicting what I posted earlier in the thread, 
but I've had more of a chance to think about it and 18 months really is 
quite a long time to wait for this functionality...)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079681.html below:

[Python-Dev] Addition of "pyprocessing" module to standard lib.