On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > > "Ryan Hitchman" <hitchmanr at gmail.com> wrote in message > news:e60c31470805181845u7fb0cafdsb0878db491eb7a3c at mail.gmail.com... > | I'd like to propose an addition to the for statement's syntax: > | > | for {variable} in {iterable} if {condition}: > | {block} > | > | which is equivalent to > | > | for {variable} in {iterable}: > | if not {condition}: > | continue > | {block} > > Is this different from > for var in filter(lambda x: condition(x), iterable)): > ? > > | and > | > | for {variable} in filter(lambda: {condition}, iterable): > | {block} > > IDLE 3.0a5 >>>> for i in filter(lambda i: i%2, range(10)): > print(i) > > > 1 > 3 > 5 > 7 > 9 How was it again? "One and only one way"? :-) -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4