Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I say leave the new names in 3.0 and let the 2-to-3 tool do its job.
> Why confuse the 2.6 landscape with double naming clutter.
To increase the common subset of code which can run on both 2.6 and 3.0
*without* invoking 2to3?
PEP-8'ifying these names also makes them easier for at least me to
remember (since I don't have to worry about whether or not the module
name includes unexpected underscores or strange capitalisation)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4