2008/5/16 Hrvoje Nikšić <hrvoje.niksic at avl.com>: > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:04 -0400, Tom Pinckney wrote: > > Here's one example, albeit from a few years ago > > > > http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/numpy-discussion/1625465 > > Thanks for the pointer. I'm not sure I fully understand Konrad Hinsen's > concerns, but maybe the problem is that Numpy's "number-crunching" needs > to call back into Python frequently. The notion of "releasing the GIL > for number-crunching" assumes that the code is structured like this: > > 1. code that works with python objects ... > 2. acquire pointer to a C struct/array ... > 3. release GIL > 4. work with C objects ("crunch the numbers") without calling any Python > code and without touching Python objects or refcounts > 5. reacquire GIL > > If step 4 needs to call into Python frequently, then this strategy won't > really work. > Hi, The current version of Numpy releases as soon as possible the GIL. The usual macros for starting and stopping a GIL release (as advertised in the documentation) are present for every step 4 work, whenever is possible (for instance it is the case for universal functions which are used in a lot of numpy's functions). Matthieu -- French PhD student Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080516/14abe80c/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4