On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM, A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote: >> Python 2.6 renames the ConfigParser module to be configparser. >> >> Distutils imports ConfigParser in various places. I just made a >> commit updating the import in one places, and then noticed that part >> of commit r63248, which made the same change, was reverted in order to >> preserve backward-compatibility. Instead, the default path will >> include lib-old again to keep the old module name available. >> >> I suggest dropping that goal, though. We've preserved compatibility >> but I'm not aware that anyone uses the Python 2.x Distutils with >> earlier versions of Python. In particular: >> >> * There's no standalone distutils package on PyPI, nor can I find >> such a package with a general web search. Am I missing it? >> >> * I do not see users advising other users to use a later version of >> Distutils to fix their problems. >> >> Is anyone actually benefiting from the effort of maintaining backward >> compatibility? > > The change was reverted at MAL's request, but he didn't qualify it > beyond wanting the backwards-compatibility. > > -Brett backwards compatibility? whats wrong with just doing: try: import configparser as ConfigParser except ImportError: import ConfigParser in the distutils code that needs to be.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4