RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 15 12:48:15 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079457.html

Gregory P. Smith schrieb:
> +0.5 on inclusion.  that means i am happy if it does but don't think
> it needs to make it into 2.6/3.0.  leave inclusion for 2.7/3.1.  its
> easy for people to install from an external source for now if they
> want it.

I'm still -0.5 on inclusion *NOW*, but +1 on inclusion in 2.7/3.1.

IMHO pyprocessing isn't mature enough - the author has labeled it as
'beta' - and the proposal came too late. It's going to take a while to
give the package a security audit and integrate the C code into Python.

Christian

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079457.html below:

[Python-Dev] Addition of "pyprocessing" module to standard lib.