RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 15 12:10:01 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079456.html

Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> -1 on "multicore" - multiprocess or multiprocessing are a fine names.
> cores are irrelevant.  systems have multiple cpus real or virtual
> regardless of how many dies, sockets and cores there are.
> 
> +0.5 on inclusion.  that means i am happy if it does but don't think
> it needs to make it into 2.6/3.0.  leave inclusion for 2.7/3.1.  its
> easy for people to install from an external source for now if they
> want it.

This is a nice summary of my opinion as well.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079456.html below:

[Python-Dev] Addition of "pyprocessing" module to standard lib.