At 12:19 PM 5/15/2008 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: >Andrew McNabb wrote: > >>If it made people feel better, maybe it should be called threading2 >>instead of multiprocessing. > >I think that errs in the other direction, making it sound >like just another way of doing single-process threading, >which it's not. > >Maybe "multicore" would help give the right impression? Sounds like a marketing win to me, since it directly addresses the "python doesn't do multicore" meme.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4