-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Alexandre Vassalotti wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:24 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" > <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >>> The idea was to replace the orignial module file with its stub. >>> However, the "svn copy" and edit process isn't the cause of the >>> problems. It is the fact that 2 files existed in the same directory >>> differing only by a case-change. >> >> I still don't understand. You wanted to replace the file with a stub, >> and then delete it? Why not just delete it (or use svn mv in the >> first >> place)? > > No. That is exactly what I wanted to avoid by using "svn copy", > instead of "svn move". "svn move" mark the original file for removal. > which makes it impossible to modify the original file on the same > commit. Anyway, Brett updated the PEP with renaming procedure that > avoids this problem completely. bzr to the rescue <wink>. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSChX5nEjvBPtnXfVAQK2NwQAgA3Gaa7Ew6uAVrqJe3B9wj/lseMuS88j y4/gtlCcb35Vtff9CpEveCD44IelaB+OFH2iG6TKXxxD47HhYfJD3STRWnphimb8 j4UXJyfJTlMIW7ISWGzv62c+RlyXle8P0VXwdfDvem8h3o8cWDBBACvlqA/6wjb0 FFQuLHedW+8= =r0hs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4