RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 12 05:35:41 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079356.html

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> On a sunny day, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> For the sake of argument, let's consider the Queue module. It is now
>> named queue. For 2.6 I plan on having both Queue and queue listed in
>> the index, with Queue deprecated with instructions to use the new
>> name.
>>
>> But what to do about all the references. Should we leave them pointing
>> at Queue to lessen confusion for people who read about some module on
>> some other site that isn't using the new name, or update everything in
>> 2.6 to use the new name?
>
> I'd say use the new names, so people can get used to them sooner --
> otherwise all you do is postpone the confusion until they're going to
> use 3.0. People who've only head of Queue will be fine as long as
> searching for Queue in the index and TOC will find them a pointer to
> queue (and that one has a "versionadded 2.6 -- renamed from Queue"
> note).
>

OK, documented as such.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079356.html below:

[Python-Dev] How best to handle the docs for a renamed module?