skip at pobox.com wrote: > This has been a fairly interesting discussion about tempfile.mktemp, but can > we return to the original question? Should we begin warning about its use > again? Should we ever warn about it? Given that there people continue to point out that there are completely acceptable use cases of it, I don't think we should ever warn about it. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4