Boris Borcic wrote: > def inst.bar(...) : ... > def fn[k](...) : ... > > should be similarly permitted. Has this ever been discussed ? Yes, but there didn't seem to be much interest in the idea. Which is disappointing, because it would be ideal for setting up function tables and such like. One small problem is that there would be no sensible name to give the function object, but that's no worse than what you get when using a lambda. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4