A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/079137.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 8: Discourage named lambdas?

[Python-Dev] PEP 8: Discourage named lambdas? [Python-Dev] PEP 8: Discourage named lambdas?Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Mon May 5 02:59:36 CEST 2008
Raymond Hettinger wrote:

>   lastname_firstname = lambda r: (r[0].lower(), r[5].lower())
>   for k, g in groupby(iterable, key=lastname_firstname): ...
> 
> That transformation adds clarity.  Going further and creating a separate
> def-statement outside the current function would just move the relevant
> code farther away and impair readability.

It doesn't have to be outside the function -- it can be
in exactly the same place as the lambda assignment above.

   def lastname_firstname(r):
     return (r[0].lower(), r[5].lower())
   for k, g in groupby(iterable, key=lastname_firstname):
     ...

Maybe "def is an executable statement" is another thing
people have a blind spot about?

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4