Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 3, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> - for experienced users (Barry, skip, etc) that want ~/.local to be
>> more easily accessible, creating a visible ~/local symlink is an
>> utterly trivial exercise.
>
> Hey Nick, I agree with everything above, except that I'd probably put
> myself more in Glyph's camp :). Can't speak for Skip though...
I was actually looking at something Fred wrote and managed to misread it
as something you had posted - and it turns out Skip was just agreeing
with Fred about the 'provide an option to tell distutils to use a
different user-specific directory name than the default one' idea, and
isn't particularly worried about where the packages go by default.
Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4