Thomas Lee wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> This leaves us with a few options: >>> >> >> 5. Reuse/Abuse Num(object) for arbitrary constants. >> AFAICT, this should work out of the box. >> >> > Eek. It *does* seem like Num would work out of the box, but would this > be a good idea? No. I suggested it just for completeness. > What about *replacing* Num with Const? Might make optimizations > specifically for numeric values slightly hairier, and semantically I > think they might be different enough to warrant separate AST nodes > despite the similarity in implementation at the compiler level. I think they should be separate. Const would be a mere addition; for compatibility with other uses of the AST, that's actually better than simultaneous removal of Num. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4