RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 1 21:38:56 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/078986.html

2008/5/1, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:

>   There may be more implications and surprising behavior surrounding this.
>
>  I know that the implementation is a compromise, but I'd rather see a
> super()
>  whose full semantics can be explained to programmers without using to
>  "cell variable", "f_localsplus" and "symtable".

In consideration of what's been said about super() in the past, and
what is handled here regarding its Py3 implementation, I want to make
a step  back, and ask:

Has super() proved more useful than harmful? Which is the value for
Py3 to keep it?

Regards,

-- 
.    Facundo

Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-May/078986.html below:

[Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()