A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078211.html below:

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond [Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyondGreg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Mar 26 00:17:28 CET 2008
ajaksu wrote:
> While Linux and OS X both view Python as essentially a first-class
> development platform-i.e., as something that shrink-wrap applications
> can be built on-Windows does not.

Even on MacOSX and Linux, you can't rely on the system
coming with the particular version of Python you want
to use pre-installed. So unless you target a very old
version of Python, you have to bundle anyway if you
don't want users to have to download and install a
bunch of dependencies.

If the situation is any better on Linux, it's probably
because Linux users tend to be more willing and/or able
to track down and install dependencies along with an
app.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4