On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > On 24/03/2008, Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> wrote: > > > safe assumption to make. A simple preprocessor step involving 2to3 requires > > > no such knowledge. > > > > As I understood it nobody has claimed 2to3 to be perfect either, but > > that using 2to3 will also require you to test the code in both > > environments, so I don't see how that is a difference. > > Do you not test the code you distribute under each version of Python > that you (claim to) support, in any case? Yes I do. I don't think my text above was unclear on the issue or could be misunderstood in this way. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4