A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078097.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.6 and 3.0 tasks

[Python-Dev] 2.6 and 3.0 tasks [Python-Dev] 2.6 and 3.0 tasksChristian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Sat Mar 22 22:09:05 CET 2008
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>  When the new buffer protocol is available in 2.6 we can start back
>>  porting bytesarray and the new IO framework.
> 
> Are these really so closely tied that they have to wait before they
> can be backported?

I've started with the backport of the bytearray type in a new branch

  svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/trunk-bytearray

Any help is appreciated. I already solved most issues.

Open tasks:

 * fix bytearray.extend()

 * add PyString support to bytearray.fromhex

 * Add old style char buffer interface to bytearray (for codecs)

 * Add old style read write buffer interface to bytearray (for
file.readinto)

 * Fix pickle and copy support for bytearray

Christian




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4