A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078090.html below:

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond [Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyondPaul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 20:56:45 CET 2008
On 22/03/2008, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> > Oh, and application installation is (should be) completely different.
>  > On Windows, applications should probably be bundled with their own
>  > Python interpreter, a la py2exe. On Unix/Linux, I don't know what the
>  > standard is, so I'd have to defer to others.
>
>
> This I disagree with. I think it's an overall bad thing to have all
>  kinds of applications ship their own copy of Python; see also Aza
>  Raskin's PyCon keynote.

Is this on Windows? It's fairly common practice. Can you give me a
pointer to Aza Raskin's keynote? Is it online anywhere? I'd be
interested in his point of view.

Paul.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4