A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078076.html below:

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond [Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyondPhillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sat Mar 22 16:33:02 CET 2008
At 11:19 AM 3/22/2008 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>Not exactly.  More like, "package management tool X claims exclusive
>rights to this package".  Python tools would always defer this right
>to the system packager, i.e. a system packager is not obliged to
>respect a Python tool's claim to a file, but not the other way around.
>
>That way, system packaging tools don't need to do anything but mark
>the installed files as belonging to them.

This probably needs to be refined a little.  Exclusive right is too 
strong, and it goes against Paul Moore's desire for using a single 
tool.  Perhaps instead what it should be is an "uninstall warning" 
field that must be displayed to a user if an interactive program is 
doing uninstallation, and that a non-interactive program must refuse 
to uninstall unless explicitly requested to go ahead.

Unfortunately, a warning message might then need to be localized.  So 
this idea still needs some work.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4