A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078074.html below:

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond

[Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond [Python-Dev] How we can get rid of eggs for 2.6 and beyond"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Mar 22 16:29:57 CET 2008
>> For those without the read-only flag, the specification should
>> explicitly say what manipulation is allowed.
> 
> Since a distribution isn't really "mutable", I would think that 
> uninstallation and reinstallation would be the only manipulation 
> available.  (As distinct from inspection, verification, and other 
> read-only activities.)

Sure, but what is precisely the semantics of uninstallation, in
terms of changes to the system state?

I think any model where uninstallation is merely the removal
of files is too limited to be practical.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4