Would anyone be averse to changing pytree.Node's __repr__ so it includes the name of the name of the symbol the node represents? The only downside is that it makes the __reprs__ longer... But I think its worth the length: Node(313:simple_stmt, [Node(298:import_name, [Leaf(1, 'import'), Node (279:dotted_as_name, [Node(281:dotted_name, [Leaf(1, 'foo'), Leaf(23, '.'), Leaf(1, 'bar')]), Leaf(1, 'as'), Leaf(1, 'bang')])]), Leaf(4, '\n')]) OR just names: Node(import_name, [Leaf(1, 'import'), Node(dotted_as_name, [Node (dotted_name, [Leaf(1, 'foo'), Leaf(23, '.'), Leaf(1, 'bar')]), Leaf (1, 'as'), Leaf(1, 'bang')])]) OR the original: Node(313, [Node(298, [Leaf(1, 'import'), Node(279, [Node(281, [Leaf (1, 'foo'), Leaf(23, '.'), Leaf(1, 'bar')]), Leaf(1, 'as'), Leaf(1, 'bang')])]), Leaf(4, '\n')])
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4