RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 17 19:10:28 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077697.html

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> Great!
>
>  I wonder though if these should really all be given "showstopper"
>  priority. IMO things don't reach showstopper status until they are
>  blocking the next release (alpha, beta or final).
>

Fine by me. If Barry has no issue with that I will drop all of their
priority to urgent. But until then I will just keep doing immediate
and change them en-mass.

-Brett

>
>
>  On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>  > Right now at the sprint I am going through a list of issues Neal and I
>  >  compiled of what needs to happen to get 2.6/3.0 out the door (although
>  >  the list is pretty much 2.6-specific). They are all being flagged as
>  >  "immediate" priority. Hopefully it won't take too long to add all of
>  >  them (although the list ain't short =).
>  >
>  >  If you want to see the list, Martin added a pre-defined Showstoppers
>  >  search to make it easy to list everything that is set to "immediate".
>
>  --
>  --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077697.html below:

[Python-Dev] Currently adding known 2.6 showstoppers to the tracker