On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > I mentioned this to Guido and got a positive response, so let me state > my preference for your feedback. I plan on holding up the final > releases until both versions are ready to go. I think this will help > motivate us to give Python 2.6 the love it needs if it's lagging > behind 3.0, and I completely agree with Guido that this let's our > community know that both versions are equally important to us. It's a deal. > The other thing is that I'd really like is a "show stoppers" Roundup > search. The idea is that if our core buildbots look good and the > "show stoppers" search turns up no items, then I know I can cut a > release (at least for alphas, betas, and rcs). If there are "show > stoppers" then I have something that I can triage (and maybe re-assign > severity) or start publicly harassing people into fixing. How about using the "critical" Severity for show stoppers? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4