RetroSearch Browse

Sun Mar 16 18:00:01 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077641.html

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> I'm changing the subject to keep this separate from the project
>  management tools discussion.
>
>
>  >  Of course I know that xturtle is only a side issue in the current
>  >  development efforts. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the procedures
>  >  needed to get a new module into Python, so I kindly ask you for your
>  >  advice how to proceed, at the same time offering my cooperation.
>
>  I think that for a library module like this, an email like you've sent
>  is just fine. Maybe Brett has a suggestion on whether it would remain
>  a toplevel module or could be placed in some umbrella package (is
>  Tkinter being moved around?).

The current plan is to introduce a tk package and turtle was to become
tk.turtle. xturtle, if picked up, can just take the place of the
current turtle at that location.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077641.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] xturtle and 3.0