On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > PyString -> PyBytes ... > > > > -1. This will make merging code from 2.6 harder, and causes more work > > for porting C extensions. > There was a thread about this a few weeks ago: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077339.html > We can still do the renaming, but alias PyString to PyBytes. That's a rather long thread. Was any conclusion reached? I'm not sure how introducing a set of aliases will help merging 2.6 code to 3.0. Can you or Christian describe the proposed approach in more detail? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4