A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077590.html below:

[Python-Dev] Windows x64 & bsddb 4.4.20 woes

[Python-Dev] Windows x64 & bsddb 4.4.20 woes [Python-Dev] Windows x64 & bsddb 4.4.20 woes"Martin v. Lšwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Mar 14 13:07:01 CET 2008
> Removing the dependency on db_static.vcproj and merging the relevant
> source code files into _bsddb.vcproj did the trick -- all x64
> bsddb-related tests now pass.  The only issue with this approach is
> that it locks _bsddb.vcproj into 4.4.20.  However, considering that
> this approach (i.e. bringing their source files into our build
> instead of linking against a static lib compiled with wildly
> incompatible flags) only took me about two minutes to implement and
> immediately fixed every bsddb problem I was encoutering, I'm
> convinced it's the right way to go.  (I can separate the dependencies
> easily enough.)

I'm convinced this is the wrong approach. Are you sure you copied
all compiler settings over to the project correctly? What is the
procedure to upgrade such a setup? What is the procedure for people
who want to build with a different version of bsddb?

Regards,
Martin


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4