Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Joost Behrends" <webmaster at h-labahn.de> wrote in message
> news:20080313010923.d1bc7ee9.webmaster at h-labahn.de...
> | With such a tuple tp i tried 'ix = tp.index(...)' recently and was
> | astonished to learn, that this doesn't work. Since we have '... in tp'
> | for me it seems, that it should make very little difference in
> | the interpreter's code, if .index() would be a method of any sequence,
> | mutable or not. Such a small difference, that this minor change
wouldn't
> | deserve a PEP.
>
> I believe .index() is part of the 3.0 sequence protocol and hence has
been
> added to tuples for 3.0. Don't know if has been or will be
backported to
> 2.6.
Python 2.6a1+ (trunk:61289M, Mar 7 2008, 19:45:46)
[GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 'index' in dir(tuple)
True
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4