RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 10 16:56:27 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077525.html

Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 12:26 PM 3/10/2008 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
>> In general, "x.append" is interchangeable with "x.append" even if
>> "x.append is not x.append", so let's go for the least surprizing
>> behavior: "m1.im_self is m2.im_self and m1.im_func==m2.im_func".
>> Objection?
> 
> Nope; that's exactly what I proposed at the end of the email quoted above.

+1 here - this is the behaviour I would expect if attempting to provide 
a called-once-only guarantee for a callback list.

Regards,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077525.html below:

[Python-Dev] Equality on method objects