> Dict access should probably be documented as no worse > than O(log n) to allow for tree implementations. That should not be documented. The current dict implementation may use O(n) for lookup operations, where n is the number of keys in the dictionary, and counting comparison operations. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4