RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 5 12:56:57 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077448.html

2008/3/5, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:

(Bringing this from python-ideas, Guido is talking about PEP 3135)

> Ehhh! The PEP's "reference implementation" is useless and probably
>  doesn't even work. The actual implementation is completely different.
>  If you want to help, a rewrite of the PEP to match reality would be
>  most welcome!

Guido, I know that in this fight-for-reality some of the PEPs for Py3
are not correct.

Which is the plan to handle this? Will the original authors fix them?
And if not, will these PEP be marked as "Caution: non compliant with
reality" or something?

PEPs are a great tool, one of the Python assets, and it's a pity that
we may not trust them...

Regards,

-- 
.    Facundo

Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077448.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] new super redux (better late than never?)