RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 29 20:04:06 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080848.html

> That would be no worse than what happens now - but its still not
> perfect (__del__ ordering issues). Also, you would need to temporarily
> revive the cycles as mentioned above (to avoid accessibility of
> partially destructed objects).

I don't quite understand what you mean by "revive cycles". There is
not need to revive any object in a cycle, as all objects are still alive
(or else they wouldn't be garbage).

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080848.html below:

[Python-Dev] Cycle collection enhancement idea