A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080828.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r64424 - inpython/trunk:Include/object.h Lib/test/test_sys.pyMisc/NEWSObjects/intobject.c Objects/longobject.cObjects/typeobject.cPython/bltinmodule.c

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r64424 - inpython/trunk:Include/object.h Lib/test/test_sys.pyMisc/NEWSObjects/intobject.c Objects/longobject.cObjects/typeobject.cPython/bltinmodule.c [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r64424 - inpython/trunk:Include/object.h Lib/test/test_sys.pyMisc/NEWSObjects/intobject.c Objects/longobject.cObjects/typeobject.cPython/bltinmodule.cRaymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Sun Jun 29 01:46:46 CEST 2008
From: "Mark Dickinson" <dickinsm at gmail.com>
> There's one other major difference between the C99 notation and the
> current patch:  the C99 notation includes a (hexa)decimal point.  The
> advantages of this include:
> 
> - the exponent gives a rough idea of the magnitude of the number, and
> - the exponent doesn't vary with changes to the least significant bits
>   of the float.

Is everyone agreed on a tohex/fromhex pair using the C99 notation as recommended in 754R?

Are you thinking of math module functions or as a method and classmethod on floats?


Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4