Yes. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > So we wait until they port their code to 2.6 to break it? > > regards > Steve > > Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >> Sounds like a regression in 2.5 (and in 2.6, and in 3.0). Probably due >> to the switch to the new AST-based compiler. Can you file a bug? I >> think we should leave 2.5 alone (too much risk of breaking code) but >> fix it in 2.6 and 3.0 if we can. >> >> --Guido >> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM, tomer filiba <tomerfiliba at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> the following code works on python 2.5: >>> >>>>>> def f(**kwargs): >>> >>> ... print kwargs >>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> f(a=5,b=7,a=8) >>> >>> {'a': 8, 'b': 7} >>> but fails on python2.4, saying that "a" is given twice. >>> is this a bug or a feature? >>> >>> >>> -tomer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Python-Dev mailing list >>> Python-Dev at python.org >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >>> Unsubscribe: >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 > Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4