On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: > ISTM, that the currently proposed output format gives > us this benefit for free (no changes to the parser). The format is already > close to the C99 notation but replaces the 'p' with '* 2.0 **' which I find > to > be both readable and self-explanatory. There's one other major difference between the C99 notation and the current patch: the C99 notation includes a (hexa)decimal point. The advantages of this include: - the exponent gives a rough idea of the magnitude of the number, and - the exponent doesn't vary with changes to the least significant bits of the float. The disadvantage is the loss of evalability. (Is that a word?) Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4