RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 26 22:09:11 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080727.html

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm personally fine with that approach, but some of the new items in there
>> for 2.6 could probably use a bit of cleaning up to improve the APIs and/or
>> the way they work.
>
> So get crackin'!

I'll add to my list. :)

Anyway, if we are going to make test.support public for real why don't
we take Nick's suggestion to rename the test package to _test, but
move test.support to a toplevel position like testutils or such.

-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080727.html below:

[Python-Dev] Undocumenting test.support in 3.x (was Py3k DeprecationWarning in stdlib)